by sandy82 » June 30th, 2005, 7:46 pm
loony28, I noticed some months ago that if grock.exe (or whatever the core program is called) is placed into a file, it cannot be moved from that file. Also, it is difficult to copy. I have handled that problem by placing grock.exe into a file (say, file A) devoted exclusively to grock.exe and perhaps containing a few of the auxiliary files. Then you can move file A, or you can make copies of file A (which automatically copies grock.exe). If you want, you can have as many of the .exe files as you have scripts.
I mentioned before that one of Grock's pluses is that you can write scripts in MS Word or WordPerfect...as long as you save the results as a .txt document. With these word-processing programs, you can copy sections extensively with no trouble, and you can search for particular portions of the script with the click of several keys. But there are drawbacks. :)
If you're like me, you wind up with scripts that are 200 pages long.
Also, I learned that the Search/Replace function can be very dangerous indeed. I thought I was changing "me" to "you". I was. I had sentences saying, "You look at your watch. You are running out of tiyou." For 200 pages.
I'm glad you found an up-to-date program. Dharden is a master detective.
demigraff, how lucky you are! I have looked at Grock off and on for over a year. It has no effect at all. I suppose one technique would be to make a script and then put it away for several months. As it stands, I know what's coming next; so there's no surprise, no anticipation. After I watch those steadily shrinking rectangles for while and listen to the metronomic clicks, I expect the Tardis to arrive at any moment.
Still, I think it's a very serviceable program. And it has the great benefit of not having too many bells and whistles which, as you know, can often give "user-friendly" Windows a case of dyspepsia.
It sounds as though you have had a better result with the program. Congratulations on that.