by b-poe-01 » May 13th, 2005, 9:53 pm
Hey folks,
First off....no offense to the skeptics here, but you could do a Google search, using the terms "remote viewing" and "Stanford Research Institute" (or its initials, SRI) and look up the material so far released by the CIA (only 10% of the total) that the Agency gathered concerning the testing, cultivating, and uses of a *well-trained* sort of ESP. :)
Basically, it all got started with regards to the possibilty that human observation of quantum level phenomenom (basically electrons, but also it involved a very sensitive gravity measuring device) could skew the results of a study at *any* distance, due to entanglement issues (long story short, at the level of subatomic particles, including electrons or electricity, which is what computers *and to some extent human brains* run on, it can be set up so that you can *link* two particles together in such a way that changing *one* causes the other to *instantly* update itself according to the changes--regardless of distance or barriers).
And that was roughly back in the late 1970s? I am not too clear on the start and end dates, but I do know that the CIA and the Research Institute *did* in fact study this sort of thing for a *decade*, spend millions of taxpayer dollars, and has recently declassified some of their info. Now....if ESP type phenomena were *all a hoax* and the CIA spent all that time and money for *nothing*, do you really think they'd *ever* admit to it?? Of course not... ;)
Granted, they've only released 10% of the info so far, but what has been released so far indicates that if you have people *properly trained in an organized protocol* and set them up in teams working together, you can make ESP type stuff work with a success rate in the low 90% range. In fact, the evidence released *so far* has been so overwhelmingly positive that in order to get a *failure* the CIA had to break its own protocol with Uri Geller and *rig* the test so he'd *fail*.
In short what the CIA and SRI have found so far is:
--it is possible to remote view or remote sense events if you know *where* they are and *roughly* what to look at (a city, a building, a car, etc.) This can be done via meditation or by using biofeedback or hypnotic trances to induce the proper mental state.
--it is possible to *entangle* one person's thoughts somewhat with another's, to the point that one person can *send* thoughts to a designated reciever. Word has it that this technique was used to *harrass* Saddam Hussein until he was found.
--it is possible to use telekinesis, provided you have a way to measure quantum-level stuff on a macroscopic level. In other words, a mind *can* alter the flow of electricity enough to tweak the performance of a computer program. And I myself have projected my own will strongly enough to make the light bulbs in my apartment *flicker*.
So to the extent that thoughts in a brain are electrical (and can be measured in terms of electro-magnetic activity on an MRI or CT scan), I'd strongly believe that telepathy can exist, and that it almost *has* to if you apply quantum physics *at all* to biological systems like neurons. :D
Of course, you don't always have to *use* the CIA's protocol to produce results...sometimes conventional hypnosis can do the trick, provided it gets both trancer and 'tist on the same sort of mental wavelength.
This is where the Jungian principle of *synchronicity* comes in....basically it is a Jungian psychologists' way of discussing ESPer stuff without the *baggage* that comes with the more popular (and halfway discredited) terms. Essentially what it means is that someone's mind becomes *congruent with* something, usually either another mind or a particular situation or both...
For instance, I've been working with one of my lady dolls online for nearly a year now, on and off. We know each other, in and out of trance at her end, and I know what to expect in terms of her *dolly* state of mind. And yes, some nights we are in synch in the sense that I can hear her voice as she types in IM, see her face and posture, get the color of her lingerie, and finish her sentences if I choose to. ;)
You could say, well duh, you know her, you hear it through your computer (which has neither a sound card nor speakers), and you know the context well enough to make educated guesses. Which is all true, except for the color of her lingerie, posture, speech patterns (an urban Texas accent, filtered through a blonde--higher pitched that is--but *rather smart* voice), and what she's going to say *out of trance*. ;)
Point is....I think ESP is possible because it's been a routine part of my life (not to mention a necessity for survival sometimes) since childhood, my older sis had more ESPer ability than I did, and to some extent it is still an *everyday* part of my life. That is the key I think, aside from making it a discipline of some sort, you also have to accept that *it happens* and that it is *somewhat* difficult to predict or control, and that there's no explaining it in a way that pleases the hardcore skeptics *as yet*.
Once you accept that it occurs, it is more likely to occur. Stop chasing the butterfly, listen to some "Hotel California", chill out, and let the bug come to you. ;)
As for changing real bodies, we still don't fully get the *complete* roles of neurotransmitters in the *whole* brain, we are just *now* getting a clue on that and how synapses work. There are still glial cells to figure out (half the mass of the brain!) and neurohormones like cortisol and oxytocin (sp?--I mean the stuff the brain releases in learning and/or orgasm). Never mind the *utterly unique* A-to-I amino acid reaction that *only* occurs in the brains of *humans* and *great apes*, proving our close genetic heiritage *once and for all*. :roll:
And never mind that matter has both a particle and a wave nature at the same time....it's just that ordinary *heat* drowns out the waveforms usually (unless you have the cryogenic tools to make a Bose-Einstien Condensate, where the liquid gas cools down to such a point that all the atoms present *get coherent* on a wave level and become *one* in wave function rather like a laser *of atoms*).
Point is, reality is more malleable than most folks think. I mean, what are thoughts if not waves? What is matter if not an *averaged out* waveform (the total net average of *all* the waveforms of *all* molecules present)?
Trust me, it's possible to take one kind of wave (say a thought or meme, of dollness) and *copy and paste*, or superimpose said wave over the *averaged out* waveform of matter (say a living person). Me and one of my lady dolls have *done this before*, I actually was able through meditation to alter her body in a doll-like direction temporarily, and she still has the *larger* breasts and *hourglass* figure to prove it (all she needs is a digital camera and some time off from her *three jobs* to take the pics and prove it). She can either maintain the bodily shape changes on her own, or keep her hair and skin shiny but not both, that takes too much effort.
And now...fair's fair. :twisted: Now she has plans to do something similar, if more subtle, to me. ;) And on occasion I do feel different, momentarily altered....contact me in email or IM for further details (private message might do initially, but I don't know how it holds up to extended private discussion).
Thanks for your time,
Brad Poe