Page 1 of 1
No deepeners?

Posted:
March 1st, 2006, 8:02 pm
by Hyp-know-fetish
I was wondering why there are no deepeners used in the files here at WMM. I mean, it would allow better results because we're more suggestable in Theta sleep than in merely Alpha. Also, I love feeling extremely deep like when I use Virtual Hypnotist's Binaural setting to achieve Delta. It makes me so suggestible that I achieved TrainNIppleOrgasm in two days. If the site used a deepener, wouldn't that help us all out?
There's a few deepeners at www.hypnosis.com :
http://www.hypnosis.com/trance/ind00.html
There's a large variety of inductions as well. :)
I know it would be hard to change the current files, but maybe any future ones... who knows? :D

Posted:
March 1st, 2006, 9:26 pm
by Jacara
I voted No only because it'd make the files too long and not necessarily make much difference; if the induction is enough to bring on a light trance, then the file should do something, but if the induction doesn't really do it for us, the deepeners won't help.
Anyway, what I'd suggest is that people use a program like Goldwave and piece together their favourite inductions/deepeners/suggestions from the files here. Having more than one induction would serve as a deepener.
For my own recordings (for my girlfriend) I DO use deepeners though. But she doesn't mind if those are large files, and also I have a trigger for her so I save time on the induction part.

Posted:
March 1st, 2006, 10:07 pm
by Hyp-know-fetish

Posted:
March 2nd, 2006, 9:28 pm
by EMG

Posted:
March 4th, 2006, 12:31 am
by Hyp-know-fetish
We have a phantom naysayer! Could the second person who voted 'no' lese explain their position? Not to be rude, but I want to hear your point of view ;)

Posted:
March 4th, 2006, 9:28 pm
by Hyp-know-fetish
lol. The first guy to vote no had a decent reason, though it got addressed. I'd like to hear the point of view of the other guy who said 'no'. If he/she has a reason, I'd love to hear about it. I don't see a problem with this personally, but maybe there's an angle I didn't catch about this.